The following IM conversation took place between me and my big time CTO friend Chris. He was talking about wanting a Macbook Air but wants to wait until they come out with a 17 inch. My response was that at that point, he should just get a Macbook Pro, especially if he really wants to use the thing. Here is his logic as to why that is not a good idea. This really has nothing to do with anything, but I was amused.
Wednesday, April 30, 2008
Comparing a Macbook Air to a breakup
The following IM conversation took place between me and my big time CTO friend Chris. He was talking about wanting a Macbook Air but wants to wait until they come out with a 17 inch. My response was that at that point, he should just get a Macbook Pro, especially if he really wants to use the thing. Here is his logic as to why that is not a good idea. This really has nothing to do with anything, but I was amused.
Monday, April 28, 2008
Your website is for the masses - not for the wealthy!
Apologies for the prolonged absence. Work and life sometimes get in the way of blogging :-)
I actually have a number of blogs in the works right now, but Andrew left a comment on the last one I posted that I disagree so strongly with that I decided to dedicate a new blog to it LOL
"I can see why Princeton may have removed that section of the website. Nothing technically wrong with talking about what those donations "buy," but there's nothing inspiring there. It's kind of like saying, "Your gift will help us buy more light bulbs." I believe the research shows that people -- at least the people who want to give transformational gifts -- don't give because of need but because they want to make the world a better place. They want to give to hope.
So, yes, we need to do a better job of telling the right story to encourage those gifts to something that is hope-inspiring."
Now, I get what Andrew is saying but I disagree strongly with a few of his premises:
1) There's nothing inspiring about what small gifts can do: Anyone who has been following Barack Obama's campaign and his incredible fundraising success would disagree with that. I think there's nothing more inspiring than illustrating that small gifts matter because they can add up to huge success. I think this is particularly important for younger alumni who may want to give but don't think that a $25 gift means anything. Personally, I think it's very inspiring when someone tells me that even a small gift matters (probably why I've given so much money to Obama at this point). I can't afford a lot, but I can afford $25 here and $50 there. I don't think they expect that $25 to stretch to the moon and back but you still need to show them that every little bit helps. If you get them in the habit of giving now, as the last graph clearly shows, they will be more inclined to give later when they're making more money to give at higher levels.
2) People who give transformational gifts don't give because of need: Well first, I would argue that your website isn't for people who want to give transformational gifts, as the title of the blog implies. It's for the masses. Show me the last time your university received a $1,000,000 gift online? A $500,000 one? A $100,00 one? It's just impractical to think that someone is going to put that on their credit card. People who are giving at this level don't need your website to be convinced - they are already being personally handled by a fundraiser in your office who's helping them through the process. (I would also disagree that they don't give because of need - at least to colleges. I think that people who make large donations give to their college because they are asked and are shown how it will impact something they have a personal affinity towards. Also, let's not completely discount the ego factor here - it's always nice to have your name on a building.)
I think this is a classic example of assuming the web is the end-all, be-all answer to everything. I think you're in for a rude awakening if you think it's the best way to woo major donors. That requires a personal touch that you just can't get over a computer. You'll have much more success if you use it to focus on those at the bottom of the fundraising pyramid.
Tuesday, April 15, 2008
New donors need the most attention
I saw an interesting piece in the Journal of the DMA Nonprofit Federation today: A Donor Isn't Really a Donor Until They Give You a Second Gift! As the title implies, the piece discusses the critical time period after a donor gives their first gift to an organization since only 30 percent of them will return to give a second gift. However, if you get them to give a second gift, you have a 40-60% chance of a third gift, a fourth and beyond. Therefore, building that relationship between the first and second gift is critical to establishing a long-term relationship with donors:

There are many tactics you can employ to establish this relationship: Personal thank-you notes, a "new donors" welcome packet, a first year anniversary gift, etc. I think the most important one for us to consider for the web is to consistently show the impact of giving. Think back to the Wired Wealthy report. One of the most engaging things you can do is to show the real-world impact of the money you are given. This should go for smaller gifts as well as larger ones, as a person's first gift to your organization (particularly from younger alumni) are probably not going to be enough to get a building named after them. I think Princeton use to do this really well (for some reason, they've decided to take this down off their site but I took a screenshot when I first saw it):

Now, of course, putting a page on your website does not equate to active engagement but its an example of the types of stories you need to be telling. Also, make sure you're tying it back into the values of your institution. I noted in the graph that once you've got a donor at a third gift, they'll probably keep giving until your or their values have changed because at that point, you've got them convinced that you are a worthwhile cause that is in line with the values they want to financially support.
Key Takeaways:
1) Giving for the first time doesn't mean your donors are convinced of the value of your institution.
2) Creating that relationship after the first gift is key.
3) Establishing relationships over time will ultimately result in more substantial gifts.
4) The web is a key component in articulating success stories and values.
Monday, April 14, 2008
Case study on pissing off your users
This post has nothing to do with higher education specifically, but its a perfect example of an idea that has been discussed on a lot of the blogs lately: paying attention to what your users on saying to you and about you online.
I'm a big talk radio person and, because I'm a staunch liberal, my station of choice until recently was Air America. My two favorite hosts are Sam Seder and Randi Rhodes. A few weeks back, Randi did a stand-up comedy routine at a club where she said a few not-so-nice things about HIllary Clinton and Geraldine Ferraro. If you are interested, here is the video of the appearance:
A few days after the event, Randi was pulled off the air and the following comment was released:

And thus the shit storm began for Air America. One of the dangers of implementing true Web 2.0 strategies on your website is, of course, giving your users some level of freedom in talking back to you (and if you insist on approving comments before they are posted, you come across as completely disingenuous). One thing I will commend Air America on is not shutting off their comments after receiving hundreds upon hundreds of them against the companies decision. Right now, there are over 750 comments in regards to this comment alone. Here are a few samples:
Suspend Rhodes, reduce your flagging listenership
Do you really think Clout and Lionel are why people listen to AAR? Really? You do? No honest, you do?
Time was when you had some serious people on the network. That's been pared down to Hartman, Rhodes, and Maddow. Now, Rhodes is gone. Two real hosts in 24 hours? You have to be kidding.
Your line up has been dripping talent for two years. My local station's decision to go to 24/7 Hispanic high school sports was prophetic. No, really, I am not exaggerating. That is what happened to a station you lost. And now I don't blame them like I used to.
Air America Cowardice
First it was Mike Malloy and now it is Randi Rhodes. I once had high hopes that we would finally have an AM station to counter the likes of Limbaugh and Hannaty. It is obvious that you do not want to hear any criticism of Hillary Clinton because she is obviously your favorite candidate. Randi did not use the kind of language for which you criticize her on the air. She spoke in front of a San Francisco audience that already knew how she felt about Clinton and i'll bet none of them were offended. Having followed the career of Hillary Clinton, I am totally in accord with every word that Randi spoke. You are cutting off your collective noses to spite your face and I am really sorry not only for Randi but for all of us who will turn off Air America.
End Randi's suspension
Start thinking like an American and not a supporter of any candidate.
Your feelings about Obama and Hillary have nothing to do with what has happened to Randi. This situation goes way beyond this campaign.
Randi made comments at a private function. She did not make these comments over the air. She did not violate any FCC rules or regulations. Her employer has now suspended her for comments she made in her private life.
Do you think its appropriate for an employer to punish an employee for something she did in her private life? How much control do you want to hand over to employers? Is Freedom of Speech only guaranteed for those people that you agree with? Is that the kind of society you want to live in?
I do not want to live in that kind of society. I implore Air America to do the right thing and bring back Randi Rhodes to the airwaves. As a progressive media outlet, AAR is undermining its own credibility with this move.
I Will Never Listen to Air America Again...
I was a daily listener of 3 shows on your station, Rachel Maddow, Randi Rhodes, and Lionel.
I can no longer listen to your network and will now browse blogs, web sites, and try to pick up Nova M Radio somehow? Does anyone know if they broadcast via web or satellite?
I'm honestly through with Air America, as their actions are no better than Faux News Channel.
Shame on you. Good luck trying to keep up membership after this Air UnAmerican act.
RIP Air America new
Mr. Kireker's statement is a lie. Randi's appearance was not sponsored by Air America, there were no AAR banners at the venue, AAR did not pay Randi's expenses, the local station and its local sponsors paid. Affiliates are not owned by AAR, they are not controlled by AAR, they are not beholden to AAR. Yes, I was there and I asked.
Whether the decision was driven by the newbie Mr. Kireker or by the clueless idiot Mark Green doesn't matter, it reeks of incompetence. The decision to "suspend" Randi was groundless and the longer she is off the air, the longer Air America is without its flagship product. AAR is going to begin losing affiliates, just like they lost their morning and mid-day slots in NYC a couple of weeks ago.
Sadly, Mr. Kireker's investment is headed down the drain and so is Air America. Thankfully, there are options and alternatives for all of the remaining talent to move to new syndications or networks. Maddow will probably move full time to MSNBC relatively soon, Rhodes and Hartmann will move to NovaM or direct syndication. Without those three, there isn't much left for AAR. The affiliates will decide, not Kireker/Green.
RIP AirAmerica
You can read more of the comments to this particular release on their website. But it gets better. About a week after the suspension, we all received this news:

Turns out Randi decided to bail and was immediately picked up by Nova M radio. As soon as this news came out, premium members started canceling their memberships left and right to move over to Nova M's premium program (full disclose, I was one of them). Here are some comments to this post (there are now well over 800, which can be viewed here):
Play Taps For Air America
YOU ARE TO IMMEDIATLY ORDERED TO CANCEL MY SUBSCRIPTION - TODAY!
WITHOUT RANDI THIS NETWORK IS NOTHING BUT DEAD AIR.
I AM CALLING MY CREDITCARD COMPANY, AS I WRITE, AND NO FURTHER CONTACT WITH ORGANIZATION WILL BE ACCEPTED.
SubwayEd
Another genious move
Unfiltered - Cancelled
Morning Sedition - Cancelled much to the chagrin of 4000+ petitioners and me in particular
So What Else is News - Cancelled
Majority Report - Cancelled
The Sam Seder Show - Cancelled
The Marc Maron Show - Cancelled
Malloy - Cancelled
Randy Rhodes - Suspended for expressing an opinion off the air
The hits just keep on coming.
What a crock. Way to go AAR
What a crock. Way to go AAR mgt. That's for ruining it. I for one will follow Randi where ever she goes and have already called my local station to express my feelings on this. You messed up your highest rated show? Wow! So long gerks.
Not only that, but her new station actually dedicated a message board to former Air America listeners that were making the switch:

But the fun doesn't stop there! Here's some background: Sam Seder use to be on 5 days a week until a year ago, when Air America booted him to bring in a "celebrity" host Lionel. This move pissed A LOT of people off - if you ever want tips on how to bring people together in a community online, Sam Seder is the guy you look too and he has quite a cult following built up (I plan on doing a post on this sometime in the future, but in the meantime check out www.samsedershow.com. This guy really gets it). Sam had been filling in for Randi for the past week or so and when news came that she quit, many listeners got very excited at the prospect of Sam taking over the spot on a full time basis. Instead, they make the brilliant move of offering celebrity guest hosts for a month:

And, predictably, this announcement was followed up by many more angry comments (view all the comments here):
lots of anger in the comments here
I just want to say that Sam does really good radio. He is as funny as Randi and as smart as Thom. He should be given his own slot daily and I will listen every day. Sam is beginning to get national recognition for his work and has written a wonderful book Fubar. He also is technically very good as a radio show host exhibiting finesse, brilliance and humor. I will miss Randi, but most of all I miss the Air America Radio that I started with in the very beginning with Al, Morning Sedition(the best show on radio). I don't listen to Lionel(too boring and egotistical), I love Thom and Rachel, but Sam is my favorite. He makes personal contact with us in a very kind way from his Sammy cam/im format which solidifies a very loyal following.
I just finished canceling my subscription and now will get my podcast free from
http://www.progressivetalk1150.com/cc-common/podcast.html
Air america needs to figure out an effective business plan and must understand that disloyalty to someone like Sam Seder will yield disloyalty from previous very loyal fans.
Sam deserves a daily show and if he does not get it here, he will get it somewhere else.
Umm, I'm so excited about the new lineup that I cancelled
my subscription. You idiots have lost me for good. I'm taking my refund and moving over to Nova M.
The only candidate for that time slot should be Sam Seder, the best political talker out there.
The fact that you are unable to appreciate his talent tells me all I need to know about your management skills.
bad choice when are you folks going to figure out progressives
Sticking "TV stars" on the radio is not going to make people interested in Air America. Lets face it you need to find radio personalities. Randi Rhodes was a great progressive voice and yes I will be tuning in at Nova to listen to her. Your best replace choice was Sam Seder. I have heard Belzer on Real Time with Bill Maher and frankly not really that impressed. Lionel may have an audience but quite frankly since he replace Sam Seder I have tuned out. His show is lame I will not be renewing my subscription.
The thing that's so annoying
is the way these kinds of decisions are always sprung on the public without any warning or explanation, and apparently without any regard for what the listeners actually want. If Sam isn't going to be given this time slot, as he obviously should be, is it asking too much for AA to give us just a HINT as to the reasoning behind this decision? It's as if nobody at AA has even the slightest clue what it means to build a relationship with consumers. This bizarre obsession with secrecy and out-of-the-blue announcements of major (and often unpopular) changes aren't doing AA any favors....
So at this point, Air America is entering week 3 of pissing off their users by ignoring thousands of comments both online and from people who call in. I can't IMAGINE how many premium memberships have been cancelled. Besides being personally vested in this in wanting my favorite host on 5 days a week, I think its an absolutely fascinating case study in what happens when you completely ignore what your users want. What a poor business decision. Not only did it cost them the #1 rated liberal talk radio host in the industry to a competing network, but it also cost them what I bet amounts to thousands of dollars in premium memberships. If nothing else, at least its entertaining to watch.
Key Takeaways:
1) DON'T PISS OFF YOUR USERS! They will rebel against you and do everything they can to discredit your organization.
2) Keeping track of what your users are saying can keep you from making bad and costly business decisions.
Key Takeaways:
1) DON'T PISS OFF YOUR USERS! They will rebel against you and do everything they can to discredit your organization.
2) Keeping track of what your users are saying can keep you from making bad and costly business decisions.
Wednesday, April 9, 2008
We interrupt your regularly scheduled programming...

Usually, I try to blog every (work) day. But not this week. In "celebration" of my decent into old age on Saturday (ok, ok....I'm only turning 27...but still! 30 is right around the corner!), I've booked myself a luxurious spa retreat at a world-renowned resort that happens to be 30 minutes away from my house :-D No computers, no stress....just me and hour after hour of spa treatments.
So while you all are doing this:

I will be doing this...

...and this...

...and this...

(yes, thats a waterfall massage :-P)
...and don't forget this...

You get the idea :-)
I may be around here or there if I get bored but I'm really going to try to cut the cord for a few days. Catch you all next week!
Tuesday, April 8, 2008
Building an admissions email marketing plan: Part 2 - When, Why, What and Calls to Action
This is the second in a series of posts on creating an
effective email marketing plan for your admissions office.
In my last post in this series, I offered some guiding principals for setting up an admissions email marketing program. From here on out, I'm going to get into the nitty-gritty. When I first started doing email marketing many years back, I was always looking for that step-by-step "how to" guide. Of course, most colleges weren't doing serious email marketing to prospective students back then so no such guide existed. I'm really hoping this blog will be a resource for at least a few people who want to get into this type of communication with their prospectives but really don't know where to begin.
So why should I bother? Email is soooooo 2003.
I bring this section up only because there are still a startling number of schools out there that are doing little to no email marketing. If you ask people to come to your website and do something, they will. Want your prospects to apply online? Then send them an email and ask them too! Ok, maybe not everyone you send it to but on average you can expect to get a 30-40% open rate and a 3-5% click through rate for your messages. The more personal and timely you make your messages, the better your rates will be. It will never be 100% (though I've had emails as high as 80% open and 60% click through) but its certainly better than the 0% you'll get by not doing email at all!
Where do I start?
A good primer for this is a previous post I did: So you need to create a marketing plan....
I'll bring it one step further with this post. Start off with the easy, no-brainer stuff. Every time there is an event, a deadline or any other important date, there should be an email to the primary audience it impacts with some sort of call to action. This may or may not require you to create a landing page with a response mechanism (be smart about when you are creating these things so you can reuse them time and time again).
So with this basic framework, let's start to build out an email calendar. These are just sample dates/events to get the ball rolling:

Next, you have to figure out the timing of your messages. This should vary based on a few factors:
1) What type of event is it? The type of event dictates the timing. Families need time to plan to attend open houses on campus, but events in their area are an easier decision. Easier still are live chats, where all you need is the luck of them being on the Internet when they occur.

With these two things in mind, we can start to assign our dates. These are not arbitrary for examples sake. Instead, I looked at the type of event and whether or not there was a print invitation to look for a good day for a followup.

Note: When I made these tables, I forgot to put live chats on here. Chats, in my opinion, are mostly a waste of time because they only appeal to the students you've largely won over (which is find during the summer when you're trying to prevent sugar off, but not so much during the year). However, they are what they are and if you do them you need to market for them. Send out an email half and hour before your chat is scheduled to start and it will bring in 75% of your audience. Also, if you send out an announcement earlier in the week, give the students a way to RSVP online. That way if they don't show up the night of, you can call them under the pretext of checking to see if they could log on OK to remind them to get their butts online.
Additional ideas for subject areas
Events are no-brainers. They are easily scheduled and basically write themselves. But don't rest on your laurels there. What are the subject areas that matter to your prospective students? I'll give you a hint: Quality academic programs (that are going to get them jobs after graduation) and kicking ass outside the classroom (athletics, community service organizations, greek life for those you like that sort of thing, etc). Also, tying emails into the business goals of the organization are never a bad idea. Here are some ideas:
-Application fee waivers: A primary call to action of any admissions office is getting your kids to apply. Offer them special codes that they can put in their online application to waive the fee in your email messages throughout the fall, culminating with a "holiday" gift if they apply before the new year.
-Regular emails talking about the cool/fun/useful/impressive things going on in your academic programs. It's near impossible to do these things on a monthly basis (because of silly things like summer vacation) but there's usually interesting things going on that prospective students want to hear about like class projects or job placements or research publications by students.
-Athletic previews (discussed further in the call to action section)
-Triggered emails: There are no better times to email your applicants than right after they've submitted their application or right after they've been accepted. Consider doing emails written by your faculty members or students in individual programs to prospects who applied or been accepted to them.
-Admissions updates: Applicants have a very specific set of needs. Regular emails updating them on key dates or aspects of the admissions process can go along way in alleviating their concerns.
When you're coming up with the content of your messages, be sure to make the mental distinction between emails meant to cultivate an audience over time and emails that are meant to push the user to take the next step in moving through the admissions funnel. News updates are for ongoing cultivation of your prospects, some of whom inquired as early as their freshman year in high school. It keeps the name of your school and your brand in their mind. Pushes to apply or deposit online are next steps. You don't do these until they are at a stage where they are mentally ready to make that decision.
So what do I write?
You've figured out when you want to send your emails and what subjects they should be about. Now what do you say?
I can't tell you specifically what to say in your emails but can say that studies show content to be 40% more effective if it speaks directly to the reader using a conversational tone rather than using a business-like, formulaic one. I don't know for sure but I would bet all the money in my pocket that this is especially true when you're trying to reach teenagers. I always thought of it as writing a blog. Speak to them simply, easily and directly and they'll respond.
I do, however, have one cardinal rule of email content:
ALWAYS have a Call To Action
I can't emphasize this point enough. If you don't have something for them to do, you should be thinking twice about hitting that send key. Even if you're doing a purely informational email, relate it back to the user and give them a call to action based on that relation. For example, at my last job I did athletic preview emails that went out to all students who had inquired to a particular sport right before the season started. They were basically just an overview of the team and what the coach expected of them during the season. The call to action at the end of the email was to go on the team's website and fill out a "prospective athlete questionnaire" to let the coach know you're interested in playing. Kids LOVED these emails. Not only did a lot of them fill out the form, but they would also reply with their various stats and clips, which we'd then forward on to the coach for them. Having a simple call to action and creating a few forms on the website allowed us to take what would traditionally just be an informational email and make it into something that students could interact with.
Key Takeaways:
1) Anything that requires a print invitation requires an email (and probably some web work)
2) Don't worry so much about what specific day of the week you're emailing. Worry about coordinating it with other mailings and communication.
3) Don't be too formal. You'll only turn people off.
4) Always give your users something to do.
Labels:
admissions and technology,
email,
marketing
Monday, April 7, 2008
The basics aren't sexy but that doesn't mean you can skip them!

A friend of mine recently pointed to me to the website of a school who shall remain nameless. Their bloggers are front and center on the school's homepage. If I click over to the "future students" link, there they are again, alongside the school's link to their YouTube account and the area to "ask a question". I also know they are active their their students on Facebook and are passionate about utilizing social networking in their admissions process.
But you know what was conspicuously missing from all of this? The ability for an interested student to fill out a form to get on the school's mailing list. I kid you not. And even for two people that are rather experienced with admissions websites, it took my friend and I both a minute to track down the link, which was buried in the third level of the site.
In an era when admissions offices are lamenting the increase stealth applications (or applications that come from students who have never inquired) in inhibiting their ability to project enrollment, why would you want to make it HARDER for a student to get on your mailing list?
On her blog Creating Passionate Users, Kathy Sierra describes the "kick ass" curve. The basic premise is that users pursue activities because they eventually want to achieve "kick ass" status, but will only put up with sucking at something so much before they give up and move on to something else. I want to adapt this idea to what I see a lot in younger (and dare I say idealistic) admissions web professionals:

Admissions web people want to do the stuff that turns them on because that is what they define as "kicking ass". In their pursuit of the kick ass stuff, they often overlook the boring but necessary stuff which they view as mundane (only obtaining them "suck" status). As boring as this stuff may be though, the basic functionality is what speaks most directly to the business goals of your institution and cannot be overlooked. Skip over it at your own peril.
It's great to be passionate about what you do. But you can't let that passion blind you to the basics that keep the lights on. Key calls to action in any admissions office are getting your students to inquire, then later apply, and ultimately enroll. These are the steps that push them through the admissions funnel. I love blogs and video and social networks as much as the next person but they are not key calls to action. They are the things that should be done once all your base functionality is there. Otherwise, you've missed the entire point.
Key Takeaways:
1) Your audience has different desires at different stages in the admissions funnel
2) The basics may not be sexy but that doesn't mean you can ignore them entirely, as they are what some of your audience members are looking for
3) Don't do the cool stuff if you don't have the basics in place
P.S.: Just so you don't think I'm completely against social networks and community building, I'm scheming on a plan that will take the treadless approach and apply it to college fundraising. Totally kick ass :-) (but in the meantime, I've implemented tactics that keep the lights on for my audience)
Friday, April 4, 2008
Thursday, April 3, 2008
Building an admissions email marketing plan: Part 1 - The Five Commandments
email marketing plan for your admissions office.
The news of emails death has been greatly exaggerated: Technology pundits have been proclaiming the death of email as a tool to reach your teenage audience for well over a year at this point. I maintain that the pundits aren't happy unless they are proclaiming the death of something. The fact is, for the type of communication a college would be doing with any prospective students, email is still extremely relevant. Remember, you're not their friend. You're more of a business contact. For their friends, in-person communication, text messaging or social networks reign supreme as their communications mediums of choice but their "business" contacts are relegated to a second-class email status. A lot of your prospective students will have created separate email accounts (that their parents have access to) for their college search process so to a real extent, they are expecting you to communicate with them through the medium. Plus its so cheap to do it will almost instantly garner a huge ROI.
Ok so it's still useful...but what do I do with it?
Before you jump into it, you need to come up with an over-arching plan or philosophy. Here are my commandments for effective admissions email marketing:

Make it timely, relevant and personal: One of the benefits of doing email marketing is that it is very easy to customize it to the individual user. A great place to look for inspiration are political emails because these guys get it. If you can, hit the user when they are most open to it, like right after they've submitted an application or have been accepted. Statistics show that emails that are sent based on a user's action are up to nine times more effective than ones that are sent whenever. Also, make sure your content is relevant to what the user has told you they are interested in. Big news in your school's biology program is not relevant to a student who's applying as an English major! By only sending out relevant content, you create a promise with your students that you will only email them when its directly applicable to their interests, which will result in higher open and click rates in the long run.
Target the type and quantity of emails to the specific audience: The more excited your students get about your institution, the more you can get away with emailing them. This excitement usually goes by high school graduation year and then admissions status:

You should always include all audiences in your plan - a freshman or a sophomore wouldn't have inquired if they weren't interested and open to being cultivated. At the same time, be mindful of what stage they are at in their life to avoid turning them off with too much communication. The communication is meant to build off of each other. You may only be able to get away with emailing a sophomore inquiry once a month but you can add more relevant communication as they move through the admissions tunnel.
E-newsletters suck...but can be salvaged (to a certain extent): E-newsletters are probably the most ineffective type of email marketing you can engage in but for some reason, directors of admissions think they are the greatest thing ever. If you find yourself forced into the position of doing one, there are ways to salvage it to make ultra-relevant to your user. Think about merging in the following fields: name, major, high school graduation year (if they're an inquiry), phone number (and ask them to update it or add a cell number to their file), admissions status (inquired, applied, accepted, etc...), any missing items from their application if they've applied, their counselors name, phone number, email and IM screenname. And, yes, I'm taking about merging it all into the same newsletter. You'll have a huge spreadsheet like you've never seen before but it is very doable.
Also, think about incorporating student profiles into your newsletters and then segment your newsletters based on major or gender or whatever so that the user can see "students like me" in the newsletter. This will re-enforce that your school is a good place for them.
Then after you've done all this personalized stuff, put all the regular mass news that they probably won't read anyway. They may read the first two articles but readers will trail off as it starts getting longer so make sure to put your most exciting stuff at the top.
Keep it simple: Email templates should be ultra simple - a tables based layout with a simple header and a simple footer. Keep it to 600px width max. Always assume your images will be turned off when they first open it. The less distractions you give them to the call-to-action the better. Test the template before you send it if you've never used it before. Campaign Monitor provides a great service that you can use to test it in a ton of email clients for $10.
Use an external provider: Higher education institutions are simply not equipped with the resources necessary to support sending email in-house. The deliverability issues alone should make it a moot point. There are a ton of great email service providers out there, some higher ed specific and some not. If you're looking for a higher ed specific one, I really like FireEngineRed and James Tower. However, don't completely discount providers that aren't specifically higher ed oriented! A lot of colleges have gone with providers like Exact Target, What Counts, Silverpop, Real Magnet or Emma. There is no one best service provider out there - make sure you do a bunch of demos to find the one that is right for your organization.
Key Takeaways:
1) Email is still a very effective way to communicate with prospective students.
2) The more personal you get to your specific user, the more effective your campaigns will be.
3) Design for usability, not for flash.
4) You're only asking for trouble if you send emails in-house.
Stay tuned for Part 2 next week!
New conference for Higher Ed Web practitioners
This year the University of Pennsylvania is hosting a new conference specifically geared towards IT/Web professionals in higher education. I actually think their schedule looks extremely promising if you're looking for practical and applicable knowledge, more-so than the usual suspects of the conference circuit.
Full disclosure, I won't be attending. After being disappointed by higher ed conference after higher ed conference I'm focusing on other events that are outside our specific realm to see what inspiration I can draw from them. But if I had a larger professional development budget, I would definitely give this one a shot. Visit their website for more information.
My next conference: An Event Apart in Boston.
Full disclosure, I won't be attending. After being disappointed by higher ed conference after higher ed conference I'm focusing on other events that are outside our specific realm to see what inspiration I can draw from them. But if I had a larger professional development budget, I would definitely give this one a shot. Visit their website for more information.
My next conference: An Event Apart in Boston.
Wednesday, April 2, 2008
The right medium for your message/audience

Yes, this was an actual conversation.
Mediums have specific audiences and uses, or goals that can be accomplished. Since the Wired Wealthy report last week, I've been thinking a lot about the different types of users we have on our websites and how we can best meet each of their needs. There are any number of different mediums that you can use to communicate with your audience online, but as the cartoon above illustrates, not every medium is appropriate for every message. It's perfectly fine to want to communicate information to an audience but we shouldn't adopt technology purely for the sake of saying we've done it.
In my head, I've split my users into two groups:
Casual Users - come to your website every once in a while when they have a question or are bored at work but typically have a passive experience. May be engaged every now and again but need to be convinced. You need to work at it to "get" them.
Super-Psyched Users - These are the users you have already won over. They come to your site often "just because." They are easy to engage because they are seeking it out from you and actually may become annoyed with you if you don't offer them ways to engage with your institution. If you're familiar with the term "solidifying your base" from politics, this is your base. They are yours to lose.
Evolution of users: I also think that users can also evolve (or de-evolve, as it were) from one of these categories to another. If you provide a really engaging experience on your website that is worthwhile to your users, than you can pull some casual users over to the super-psyched side of the house. On the same token, if you don't provide an engaging experience, your super-psyched users will become bored with something back to your site time and time again with nothing to do and will eventually give up altogether.
Based on these categories, I developed the chart below. I'm sure I've left some stuff out so I won't claim that it's all inclusive.


Of course your super-psyched users will also be interested in your website or your email announcements and that sort of thing. But my theory is that your primary audience for that sort of thing are your casual users because your super-psyched users are getting their information form the different types of communication they've engaged themselves with. The point of classifying those specific mediums to casual users is that you have to be careful that the content your write for those mediums is focused on the majority audience. The Wired Wealthy report clearly points out that your more casual users actually get annoyed with too much flash when they are just looking for a piece of information. If all we're doing it trying to get them to give a gift or fill out an application, then we certainly don't want to turn them off before they've completed that task.
I'll also say this: In terms of effort, your super-psyched users aren't the ones you have to put a lot of effort into recruiting to your cause. Now, it may be more fun to deal with them but if you've already won them over then aren't your energies better spent elsewhere? Not 100% elsewhere of course....solidifying the base and all...but the majority of your energy should be spent on winning your casual users over.
Key Takeaways:
1) Make sure you're picking the right medium for your message. A one-off webpage doesn't get more exciting if you call it a blog.
2) Different audiences gravitate towards different types of communication.
3) If a user is seeking to be engaged, make sure you provide them the opportunity to do so.
4) Put your energy where you have the most to gain.
Tuesday, April 1, 2008
Radiohead hosts contest for fans to create their own remix
Just got home and saw this on my homepage:


You can buy the different tracks on iTunes and then upload your remix to www.radioheadremix.com. You can also go there to listen to other remixes that have been created and vote on the one you like best. For the people that have created remixes, you can create a widget to add to your website to promote it.
Clearly Radiohead gets it :-)
Key Takeaways:
1) Letting people manipulate your content is engaging
2) Involving the community takes it to the next level
It's your job to be "in the know"
It's a very slow week for me so I'm not really finding a lot of inspiration for blogs in my job at the moment. So I'm going to reach into my back pocket and pull out an idea from my last job in admissions (though it could be applied to any area of higher ed really).
If you take anything away from this blog, I hope it's the idea that we can't get tunneled visioned on the web because the web is not the end-all be-all experience that our users have with our institutions.
As web professionals, we tend to get so caught up in what we're doing and all the cool possibilities that all we see is this:

To be truly effective at our jobs, we need to pull back and get the 40,000 foot view of everything that's going on:

These touch points do not exist in a vacuum to our users and they aren't differentiating them as coming from different parts of the university. Whether you're targeting prospective students or alumni, they expect us to all be talking to each other and coordinating our communications efforts. It should be seamless and the medium should never call attention to itself. They should be taking the call to action without having time to even think about it.
Unfortunately, higher education is less than conducive to the type of communication required to keep things seamless for the users. Too many egos. Too many people obsessed with being "the director" and thus being "the decider" ;-) That means that its up to you to be proactive and find out what other areas are up to because even when you ask, its hard to weasel information out of people. Start with the base assumption that any time ANY event happens on campus that affects a significant external audience, there will be a print piece and its your job to get your hands on it BEFORE it hits the mailboxes of its audience. I'll illustrate why through an actual example from my last job surrounding an open house invitation:
I had sent out an email to everyone responsible for any sort of print piece to prospective students asking them to show me any print piece that was going to go to prospects before it was sent so I could make sure there was a web component to it. I knew there was an open house invitation in the works but didn't know when its drop date was and had hoped that when it was produced, a copy would make its way across my desk. Rather predictably however, no one paid attention to my original email.
Below, I've mocked up a sample open house invitation that went out (obviously this is to illustrate a point and is not an exact replica...but its pretty damn close):

Now, had I seen the open house invitation before it hit the streets, this is how my mind would have worked:

Unfortunately I didn't see the invitation before it went out. The website was already set up and was pretty solid based on previous years and I had just assumed that when the invitation was ready, a copy would be circulated. Instead, here is how I found out the invitation went out:

It turned out the invite had gone out a week or so beforehand. Even though there hadn't been a call to action on the web, I think I had "trained" the prospective students at the time to expect some form of online RSVP so for them, it was still a viable option to log on for more information. It's actually a good thing there wasn't a push to sign up online because since I had never seen the print invitation, little did I know that the information it asked for was different than had been used in previous year and the online form did not match up. By the time the mistake was caught, over 70 students had registered online for the event and now we needed to track down all of them and say "Oops, our bad that we didn't ask you for the right information in the first place." Here's the plan that was put in place:
1) Open house form revised with new fields
2) New form created that collected information from students who had already submitted the original form
3) Email sent out to all students who had RSVPed online, sending them to the new form to collect additional information.
It also took about a day of my time to assess the problem and fix it that could have been spent working on other things.
Now by itself, aside from being a complete pain in the ass, this whole fiasco wasn't a hugh deal. But if its representative of a larger problem and your users are consistently being needlessly inconvenienced because of your lack of planning or your institution's lack of buy-in then I would begin to qualify it as a problem. After a while, your users are going to look at you as amateurs. Consider, for a second, that the prospective students this invitation was targeted at were actually prospective donors with the ability to make a $35,000/year contribution to your institution. Would you treat them like this? If so, I don't think you would have a job for very long.
Key Takeaways (new feature on karlynmorissette.com :-) ):
1) A user's experience does not exist in a vacuum and should be seamless across mediums
2) If you know what the other marketing touch points are, you can better hone your web presence for effectiveness.
3) People obsessed with being a director are usually tools.
Labels:
admissions and technology,
marketing,
print-to-web
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)